Breastfeeding is one of the world's most natural and significant bonding and nourishment systems. Yet, over the 20th century, the perception of breast milk and breastfeeding has changed dramatically – not due to biological reasons, but due to economic interests and societal narratives.
Here's an overview of how industrial influences have undermined breastfeeding over decades.
1. The Rise of the “Substitute Product Culture”
With the advent of industrially manufactured infant formula, breastfeeding was increasingly presented as "one option among many."
Breast milk used to be a given – suddenly there were alternatives marketed as "advanced" and "scientifically precise."
Industry advertising conveyed to mothers that breastfeeding was old-fashioned or unnecessary – a massive shift in image.
2. Aggressive Marketing Strategies
For decades, in many countries:
-
free formula samples were distributed to clinics
-
mothers were approached directly in postnatal wards
-
doctors and midwives were specifically promoted as "multipliers"
-
product samples and promotional materials were used to build trust
This often led to mothers supplementing early – and thus unintentionally breastfeeding less.
3. The Devaluation of Maternal Competence
Advertising promised "controlled, measurable, precise nutrition."
This narrative unsettled many women:
-
"Do I have enough milk?"
-
"Is my milk nutritious enough?"
-
"Couldn't industrially produced food even be better?"
The industry profited from these doubts – even though breast milk is biologically unique.
4. The Loss of Knowledge & Breastfeeding Culture
For generations, breastfeeding knowledge was traditionally passed down.
With the boom of substitute products:
-
fewer mothers breastfed
-
practical experience in the environment was increasingly lacking
-
everyday knowledge necessary for successful breastfeeding was lost
As a result, breastfeeding faded into the background in many societies.
5. Societal Expectations – Work, Body Image, Burden
Parallel to industrialization, gender roles changed:
-
returning to work sooner
-
bodies should look "normal again" quickly
-
breastfeeding was portrayed as burdensome or time-consuming
Many of these ideas were reinforced by marketing that promoted industrially produced food as "flexible and modern."
6. Lack of Political Support
For a long time, in many countries, there was:
-
no adequate parental leave
-
no breastfeeding or pumping support at work
-
little professional lactation consultation
This made breastfeeding more difficult in everyday life – and substitute products became the pragmatic solution.
7. The Turning Point: International Criticism
In the 1970s and 1980s, a strong global counter-movement began.
Organizations, activists, and health authorities drew attention to the consequences:
-
declining breastfeeding rates
-
health disadvantages for babies and mothers
-
unethical advertising practices
Today, international guidelines exist (e.g., the WHO Code for the marketing of breast milk substitutes) that aim to restrict advertising.
8. Where do we stand today?
Although much has improved, old narratives persist to this day:
-
"Formula is just as good as breast milk."
-
"Breastfeeding is complicated or unreliable."
-
"One shouldn't breastfeed for too long."
Many of these ideas originated from decades of intensive marketing.
Conclusion: Breastfeeding was not weakened by mothers' lack of ability – but by a system of marketing, lack of support, and societal expectations.
Breastfeeding is once again more in the public consciousness today.
But history clearly shows:
It was never breastfeeding that failed – but the surrounding structures.
